Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Art. Show all posts

Thursday, 16 June 2011

Can Art be a good investment?*



If you pop down to your local art gallery, you will probably see a range of different works of art on display. If you ask your friendly art gallery owner what you should purchase as a good ‘investment’, he or she will almost certainly say ‘buy what you like’. Firstly, this absolves him of any responsibility to you, and also means he is free to sell you almost anything, at almost any price, as long as you ‘like’ it.  

Art is a market estimated to be worth in the region of $50 billion annually as of 2007.Since then it has dropped, and some commentators believe its present level to be around $15-20 billion. In reality, the art market is not one single market, but many different markets operating in many different countries, at many different levels, all at the same time. Art is a generic term which includes painting, ceramics, antiques and more categories, most of which have specialist experts and traders.

 If we are to get into the nitty gritty of whether art is or can be a good investment (the action or process of investing money for profit), rather than just speculation (a conjecture without firm evidence) we have to be much more specific about what we are talking about. Being more specific means identifying which art market and which artist, and maybe even what period we are talking about.

The art market is the last unregulated market of significant dimension in the world. The art markets are generally regarded as being extremely inefficient, opaque and riddled with conflicts of interest. All wise investors know that where these characteristics exist, combined with the lack of regulation means that there exist significant opportunities for financial gain. But the opportunities for financial gain mainly accrue to those relatively few players who have the time, the expertise and the capital to turn the opportunities into financial gain.


The art markets are dominated by the main auction houses which are Sotheby’s and Christies, followed by Bonham’s and other smaller auction houses who account for between 25- 50% of the market. The other 50% or so is made up of art dealers, galleries and the many other players in the markets.

In 2007 the USA accounted for 46% of the world’s art auction turnover. The second largest market was the UK, followed by China who had just recently displaced France from third position. Traditionally as the USA accounted for such a large part of the art markets, it is not unsurprising that the markets are driven by the spending power and tastes of American collectors. The state of the American economy and the international value of the dollar is a strong influence in many parts of the art markets. However in 2010 China became the premier player in the market with a 34% market share, pushing the Americans into second place. A new order has come into existence.

There is one golden rule in the art markets. It is only after an artist is dead, and that his work is therefore concluded, that a consensus of art experts will build up about the recognition and value that can be attributed to that artist. But it is only by producing consistently good work in some volume during their lifetime that artists can come to the attention of the major players in the markets and achieve that recognition.

Like all markets art is affected by supply and demand. Demand will depend on how much fame an artist can achieve for himself and his work during his lifetime. As Andy Warhol put it ‘Everyone will be famous for 15 minutes’. But they will need to be famous for a lot longer than 15 minutes if their art is ever to be considered an investment, rather than a decorative object, because as Warhol so succinctly put it ‘An artist is somebody who produces things that people don't need to have’. The trick here is that if you buy something that you don't need to have, but you want it, will other people want it too?


*This is the first blog of a series by Luxury Hedonist on Art as an investment.

Wednesday, 20 April 2011

The Genius of Picasso




They say that artists do not see things in the same way as you or I. If you have ever seen an artist at work, you will notice that they spend more time looking at their subject than actually putting the subject onto the paper. The more they look, the more they see. The more they see, the more they can find a different or unique angle of representation of their subject. Good artists will not only try to make us see, but also make us think.

Picasso was unique because he made us think much more than most artists. His talent was prodigious, and with his talent came a supreme self confidence in his abilities, which also apparently included seeing into the future. By 1905 Picasso had become a favourite artist of the American art collectors Leo and Gertrude Stein, who were living in Paris, and who became his principal patrons. Picasso painted a portrait of Gertrude Stein, and on seeing it someone commented that Stein did not look like her portrait. Picasso confidently replied, ‘She will’.

Picasso was one of the leading exponents of the artistic movement called Cubism. It was almost as though the artist was splitting up the means of conveying his message into its component parts, and assembling them in a different way to how reality might show them. An eloquent and intriguing example of this was The Guitar Player (1910), which might have you searching for hours to find the component parts of the guitar and its master.
Many commentators believe that Picasso’s greatest work is Guernica, his depiction of the German bombing of the town of Guernica, during the Spanish Civil War. This event inspired Picasso into a frenzy of activity for a mural for which he had been commissioned for the Spanish Pavilion at the World Exposition in Paris in 1937. The result was a masterpiece of conflicting images expressing the almost universal outrage at the killing of innocent, defenceless civilians, in acts of barbarism which showed the absolute depths of depravity to which humanity had fallen. Anger, hopelessness, despair and fear, all these emotions are expressed here, amongst others. As the man himself put it on being asked to explain its symbolism, “It isn’t up to the painter to define the symbols. Otherwise it would be better if he wrote them out in so many words! The public who look at the picture must interpret the symbols as they understand them.”
Step by step, the genius of Picasso had taught us through his art, firstly how to see, then how to think, and finally how to feel. And then maybe, just maybe, how to act.